Far Cough
10:15 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I remember the days when you had to practically murder a player before you got a penalty, now you get one if you breathe a bit too hard on a player
|
tunwhu
10:13 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
What Jonah said
|
Jonah Lomas
10:01 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
In my opinion Brucies, you've just summed up everything that is wrong with football now with this question:
"Why should a striker make an effort to stay on his feet when he is clearly fouled? "
There is absolutely no way that the contact was enough to cause Kane to fall over, but he did, specifically to ensure the referee gave him a penalty.
It's becoming a game for cheaters to prosper, more than ever so before.
Players are diving and tumbling and rolling round in agony all over the field now, and the refs and administration are doing anything about it, even in some of the most blatant cases.
And yet, it's a free for all at a corner, and more often than not, if anything is given it's against the attacking team.
You don't see it in most other sports.
|
Brucies_Star_Prize
9:55 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
It was a penalty, clear as day.
Whether Kane could have stayed on his feet is irrelevant, there was easily enough contact with the push and the clip of the leg to justify the decision.
If Kane had stayed on his feet he wouldn't have been awarded the penalty - the same goes for the majority of penalty incidents. Why should a striker make an effort to stay on his feet when he is clearly fouled?
|
Paulo Di Godio
9:49 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
JGW1 8:31 (& 8:32!)
That is the single, most accurate description of the incident I have seen yet. It's absolutely spot on. There is zero doubt he tried to get the contact and zero doubt that by the time it came he was already at 45 degrees and going to hit the floor 0.2 seconds later.
NEVER in a million years is that a correct penalty decision.
|
62Hammer
9:03 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I never understand when pundits say "he put a hand on him and gave him the opportunity to go down". So putting your hand on someone (or any kind of minor contact) is wrong, but deciding you're going to throw yourself to the floor as a result of it is ok.
It's not, it's cheating, and I wish some of the media would have the guts to say it sometimes.
|
Willtell
8:40 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
JGW1 8:35 Mon Feb 23
"No he didnt"
Oh yes he did!
|
Takashi Miike
8:40 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
blatant dive
|
,
8:36 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Kane won the penalty so give him some credit. He could not have done it without the help of Song though.
|
ornchurch ammer
8:36 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
As I have said before, for the hard of thinking, this is not solely about yesterdays penalty but a general point.
How many times do you hear "he felt a hand on him so was entitled to go down". Why?
Do you go down if someone puts a hand on you if it is a bit tight on the underground?
I accept that a push and shove is a foul, although apparently not from a corner, but placing a hand on someone - unless we want a game stopped every few seconds then no way.
|
JGW1
8:35 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
No he didnt
|
Willtell
8:34 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Yes it was definitely a penalty and Kane went down because he was tripped. The 'push' was Michael Owen's commentary and had nothing to do with why Kane went down. Song caught Kanes heel....
|
JGW1
8:32 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Make that 13!
|
JGW1
8:32 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Like ive said a dozen times ..... Kane throws his left leg back to try to make contact with Song but misses and starts to go down. As he has stopped in his tracks Song makes contact with him putting his hands out instinctively. Kane was already on the way down. Thats all there is to it. I dont give a fuck what the pundits say. They are routinely the most myopic and self serving bunch of twats (after managers) in the game. And i especially don't care about your view after some of the tosh you posted yesterday.
|
JGW1
8:31 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Like ive said a dozen times ..... Kane throws his left leg back to try to make contact with Song but misses and starts to go down. As he has stopped in his tracks Song makes contact with him putting his hands out instinctively. Kane was already on the way down. Thats all there is to it. I dont give a fuck what the pundits say. They are routinely the most myopic and self serving bunch of twats (after managers) in the game. And i especially don't care about your view after some of the tosh you posted yesterday.
|
norwaytips
8:28 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I've not seen a newspaper report, that said it was not a penalty. I never heard a commentator say it wasn't a penalty. The players hardly complained at all. Who is saying that it wasn't? Yep, us Hammers; and we aren't biased, all the others are. :-)
|
Mad Dog
8:07 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I'm also very very suspicions of any penalty after the 85 minute Mark
|
Garth Algar
8:06 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I am over it Davies, but still believe it wasn't a penalty, that's all.
|
Mad Dog
8:04 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
I said the same yesterday. It's not fucking netball merely touching an opponent is NOT a foul.
It was a dive pure and simple and every single time i see this it pisses me the fuck off.
If someones at full tilt and gets a knock i can see how that could knock you over. Otherwise its a crock of shit. If you make a decision to fall down its a dive. Pure and simple
|
1985
8:00 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Modern football is shit in as much as it's become namby pamby with no proper tackles anymore. poncey millionaire footballers rolling around as if they've been shot and then get up as soon as they've hoodwinked the officials. Tarts.
And Tomkins had better get that out of his game. I thought he'd learned after that face-clutching episode but yesterday he was at it again, the spurs bloke hardly touched him but he went down holding the back of his head. wtf
|
JustAFatKevinDavies
8:00 Mon Feb 23
Re: Since when was putting a hand on someone a foul?
|
Get over it ffs, he made the most of it but it was a penalty
|
| 
